Checked
X / Twitter
Existing priority items reconfirmedLatest-search sample of pwnlambda, calif_io, opa334dev, and alfiecg_dev posts from November 3. The release announcement and persistence demo are already tracked.
Sources & checks
Research passes run at 08:00 and 20:00 Pacific. The repository check runs at 03:23 and 15:23 UTC.
Latest source pass
Sampled coveragePartial
Discord
Discovery sample reviewedRecent linked research discussions sampled. Existing Calif sources resurfaced. A screenshot-only lead was held for stronger public evidence. Search coverage was partial.
Checked
GitHub
Six watched repositories unchangedDefault-branch commits and newest public releases compared with reviewed baselines. Research claims remain tied to their reviewed revisions.
A check time records the coverage described above. It does not certify an entire platform or every post. An inaccessible source is recorded as blocked, never as unchanged.
Watched repositories 6
Check runs| Repository | Reviewed commit | Release | Tracked as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xplo8E/Liter8 | fd46d747 | v0.2.3 | Liter8 |
| MchinaMd57764/AVETemporalPoC-CVE-2026-112705 | ace18d23 | None | AppleAVE2 · temporal layers |
| MchinaMd57764/CVE-2026-112706-CoreMedia-fd-leak | ead6cf10 | None | CoreMedia · file descriptors |
| Xplo8E/CVE-2026-112621-oob-write-poc | c514d0e4 | None | LinkPresentation · HEIC |
| Ping-2o/CVE-2026-112611-cg-shading | ef20b59a | None | CoreGraphics · PDF shading |
| pwnlambda/talks | 46ed3b98 | None | No entry yet |
A changed commit or release opens a review issue. The research pass reads the artifact before the tracker changes.
Pending evidence 1
Held from the main registerPending evidence
CoreGraphics · PDF shading
MissingRaw crash evidence withheld; CVE assignment remains tentative.
Existing assessmentHolding an item means its public evidence is insufficient for the main register. It is not a judgment about whether AI was used.
Publication gate
Full review criteriaRequired for a new repository
- Inspectable code that implements the claimed behavior
- An exact target and build
- Useful supporting evidence or a control
- Claims that match the artifact
Can qualify with explicit labels
- Original researcher announcements
- Demonstrations (not counted as public exploits)
Sourcing
- Discord supplies leads; public entries cite public primary sources
Held out
- Reposts and recycled code
- Placeholder exploits
- Screenshots without a verifiable claim
- README-only repositories
Not evidence
- Repository stars and writing style